Nc. Arbour et al., TRANSCRIPTIONAL CONTROL OF THE OSTEOCALCIN GENE BY 1,25-DIHYDROXYVITAMIN D-2 AND ITS 24-EPIMER IN RAT OSTEOSARCOMA CELLS, Biochimica et biophysica acta, N. Gene structure and expression, 1263(2), 1995, pp. 147-153
The effects of two vitamin D analogs, 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D-2 and 24
-epi-1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D-2, were examined on osteocalcin gene expr
ession in the rat osteosarcoma cell line ROS 17/2.8. Our results indic
ate that these analogs are more transcriptionally active than 1,25-dih
ydroxyvitamin D-3, particularly the 24-epimer. Assessment of reporter
gene chloramphenicol acetyltransferase (CAT) activity, using the vitam
in D responsive element (VDRE) derived from the human osteocalcin gene
promoter, revealed that both analogs stimulated CAT activity 5- to 10
-fold. 1,25-Dihydroxyvitamin D-2 was slightly more active than 1,25-di
hydroxyvitamin D-3, while the 24-epimer was twice as effective. 1,25-D
ihydroxyvitamin D-3 also stimulated osteocalcin mRNA accumulation by 2
-fold over vehicle-treated cells, 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D-2 by 2.5-fol
d, and 24-epi-1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D-2 by 4-fold. Electrophoretic mob
ility shift assays using the osteocalcin vitamin D responsive element
revealed no increase in DNA binding with either analog when compared t
o 1,25-(OH)(2)D-3. Examination of CAT activity using the rat 24-hydrox
ylase VDRE indicated no significant difference in transcription with t
hese compounds, suggesting that the vitamin D-2 analogs preferentially
activate osteocalcin gene expression.