CLASSIFICATION OF RHABDOMYOSARCOMAS AND RELATED SARCOMAS - PATHOLOGICAL ASPECTS AND PROPOSAL FOR A NEW CLASSIFICATION - INTERGROUP RHABDOMYOSARCOMA STUDY
Wa. Newton et al., CLASSIFICATION OF RHABDOMYOSARCOMAS AND RELATED SARCOMAS - PATHOLOGICAL ASPECTS AND PROPOSAL FOR A NEW CLASSIFICATION - INTERGROUP RHABDOMYOSARCOMA STUDY, Cancer, 76(6), 1995, pp. 1073-1085
Background. There is a need to develop a single prognostically signifi
cant classification of rhabdomyosarcomas (RMS) and other related tumor
s of children, adolescents, and young adults which would be a current
guide for their diagnosis, allow valid comparison of outcomes between
protocols carried out anywhere in the world, and should enhance recogn
ition of prognostic subsets. Method. Sixteen pathologists from eight p
athology groups, representing six countries and several cooperative gr
oups, classified by four histopathologic classification schemes 800 re
presentative tumors of the 999 eligible cases treated on Intergroup Rh
abdomyosarcoma Study II. Each tumor was classified according to each o
f the four systems by each of the pathologists. In addition, two indep
endent subsamples of 200 of the 800 patients were reviewed according t
o the new system, so that 343 distinct patients were reviewed once, an
d 57 of these twice. Results. A study of the survival rates of all sub
types in the sample of 800 patients led to the formation of a new syst
em. This was tested on two independent subsets of 200 of the original
cases and found to be reproducible and predictive of outcome by univar
iate analysis. A multivarlate analysis of the 343 patients classified
according to the new system indicated that a survival model including
pathologic classification and known prognostic factors of primary site
, clinical group, and tumor size was significantly better at predictin
g survival than a model with only the known prognostic factors. Conclu
sion. This new classification, termed International Classification of
Rhabdomyosarcoma (ICR) by the authors, was reproducible and predictive
of outcome among patients with differing histologies treated uniforml
y on the Intergroup Rhabdomyosarcoma II protocols. We believe it shoul
d be utilized by all pathologists and cooperative groups to classify r
habdomyosarcomas in order to provide comparability among and within mu
lti-institutional studies.