Historical analysis suggests that the decline and fall of the will was
due not to any major piece of empirical work demonstrating that the c
oncept was unsound but to general changes in philosophical fashion, an
d to the temporary influence of the anti-mentalistic tenets of behavio
rism and the anti-volitional assumptions of psychoanalysis. Clinical d
isorders like abulia and impulsiveness share conceptual features that
19th-century alienists captured well in their clinical category of dis
order of the will. Current accounts, which include semi-explanatory co
ncepts such as ''drive'' ''motivation'' or frontal lobe ''executive''
are not conceptually better than the old notion of will nor are they s
uperior as correlational variables for neurobiological studies. It is
suggested that the will, updated according to modern work in the philo
sophy of action, be re-adopted as a research category in current psych
iatry.