Ac. Schwarzer et al., THE PREVALENCE AND CLINICAL-FEATURES OF INTERNAL DISC DISRUPTION IN PATIENTS WITH CHRONIC LOW-BACK-PAIN, Spine (Philadelphia, Pa. 1976), 20(17), 1995, pp. 1878-1883
Study Design. This was a cross-sectional analytic study of patients wi
th chronic low back pain. Objective. To investigate whether the criter
ia for internal disc disruption, as adopted by the International Assoc
iation for the Study of Pain, could be satisfied in patients with chro
nic low back pain and to test whether there were any conventional clin
ical features that could identify this condition. Summary of Backgroun
d Data. Internal disc disruption has been postulated as an important c
ause of low back pain. To diagnose this condition, the International A
ssociation for the Study of Pain taxonomy requires that pain be reprod
uced on provocation discography and that computed tomography discograp
hy reveal internal disc disruption, provided that as a control, stimul
ation of at least one other disc fails to reproduce pain. Methods. Nin
ety-two consecutive patients with chronic low back pain and no history
of previous lumbar surgery were studied. Each patient underwent a sta
ndard physical examination. Computed tomography discography was perfor
med at a minimum of two levels. Results. The diagnostic criteria for i
nternal disc disruption were fully satisfied in 39% of patients, most
commonly at L5-S1 and L4-L5. None of the clinical tests used could dif
ferentiate between those patients with internal disc disruption and ot
her patients. Conclusions. A diagnosis of internal disc disruption can
be made in a significant proportion of patients with chronic low back
pain, but no conventional clinical test can discriminate patients wit
h internal disc disruption from patients with other conditions.