Mutations induced by the integration of a Mu gem2ts mutant prophage ca
n revert at frequencies around 1 X 10(-6), more than 10(4)-fold higher
than that obtained with Mu wild-type. Several aspects characterize Mu
gem2ts precise excision: (i) the phage transposase is not involved; (
ii) the RecA protein is not necessary; and (iii) revertants remain lys
ogenic with the prophage inserted elsewhere in the host genome. In add
ition, prophage re-integration seems to be non-randomly distributed, w
hereas Mu insertion into the host genome is a transposition event with
out any sequence specificity. In this paper, we describe that the site
of re-integration somehow depends on the original site of insertion.
Two alternative models are proposed to explain the strong correlation
between donor and receptor sites.