K. Andenaes et al., A PROSPECTIVE, RANDOMIZED SURVEILLANCE STUDY OF POSTOPERATIVE WOUND INFECTIONS AFTER PLASTIC-SURGERY - A STUDY OF INCIDENCE AND SURVEILLANCE METHODS, Plastic and reconstructive surgery, 96(4), 1995, pp. 948-956
In a postoperative wound infection study in plastic surgery, 315 patie
nts were randomized to either outpatient wound control after 30 days (
group I) or self-control by questionnaire (group II). We present a new
definition of wound infection based on physiologic wound healing. The
surveillance of postoperative wound infection showed follow-up rates
of 95 and 68 percent and infection rates of 16.3 and 17.1 percent for
groups I and II, respectively. Of the 43 patients (16.7 percent) with
postoperative wound infections, 31 (72 percent) were diagnosed after l
eaving the hospital, and only 12 (28 percent) were diagnosed during ho
spital stay. The monthly wound infection rate declined from 23.5 perce
nt when the registration started to 12.2 percent at the end of the sur
veillance. The wound infection rate nearly tripled when duration of su
rgery was more than 120 minutes compared with less than 60 minutes. Po
stoperative wound infection was significantly related to preoperative
contamination class, with an increase from 10.2 percent wound infectio
ns in class ''clean'' to 37.5 percent in class ''dirty.'' We conclude
that postoperative wound infection also crops up in the plastic surgic
al department, and this situation has not, to date, been documented su
fficiently. A simple questionnaire gives a useful survey of postoperat
ive wound infections. An active follow-up for at least 30 days is esse
ntial to register the late of surgical infections.