E. Galvezruano et al., ON IDENTIFYING A 2ND MOLECULAR ANTAGONISTIC MECHANISM OPERATIVE AT THE GLYCINE RECEPTOR, Journal of neuroscience research, 41(6), 1995, pp. 775-781
We used molecular modeling techniques to examine six reported antagoni
sts of glycine with varying K-i values against strychnine. We found th
e data suggest two groups operating with different mechanisms. In grou
p 1 (strychnine, brucine, Pitrazepin, and bicuculline methobromide) th
e antagonist contains two or three sites that can electrostatically bi
nd to the three comparable groups of opposite charge in the recognitio
n site where the natural neurotransmitter binds, thus opening the chlo
ride channel. In addition, when in this position, the antagonist is ab
le to also block the now opened chloride channel with a different port
ion of its structure. In many cases, this involves an interaction betw
een a carbonyl group on the antagonist and the guanidinium group of ar
ginine which is part of the polypeptide segment of the outer mouth of
the chloride channel (Grenningloh et al., Nature 330:25-26, 1987). In
group 2 (R5135 and 1,5-diphenyl-3,7-diazaadamantan-9-ol) the antagonis
t contains charged sites but when one of these molecules attaches to t
he recognition site, the chloride channel is not opened. In addition,
R5135 contains a carbonyl group which attaches to arginine as pointed
out in the text, whereas 1,5-diphenyl-3,7-diazaadamantan-9-ol contains
a phenyl group that can block the channel. (C) 1995 Wiley-Liss, Inc.