A research program on intellectual discussion in academic institutions
is presented as a case that illustrates a method for constructing gro
unded practical communication theory. Within a practical discipline pe
rspective, theory is conceived as a rational reconstruction of practic
es for the purpose of informing further practice and reflection. The t
heoretical reconstruction of communication practices can be undertaken
at three interrelated levels of analysis, here called the technical,
problem, and philosophical levels. Based on interpretive discourse ana
lysis of recorded departmental colloquia and interviews with participa
nts, we identify a complex interactional dilemma that arises within th
is type of communicative situation (problem level), specific technique
s by which participants attempt to cope with that dilemma (technical l
evel), and two situated ideals to which they have recourse for reflect
ing on the normative basis of their own and others' actions (philosoph
ical level). Because of the ways grounded practical theory differs fro
m other theoretical approaches, we argue that existing criteria for ev
aluating theories must be rethought within this radically reflexive en
terprise.