EFFECTS OF A BEHAVIORAL WEIGHT-LOSS PROGRAM STRESSING CALORIE RESTRICTION VERSUS CALORIE PLUS FAT RESTRICTION IN OBESE INDIVIDUALS WITH NIDDM OR A FAMILY HISTORY OF DIABETES

Citation
Rw. Pascale et al., EFFECTS OF A BEHAVIORAL WEIGHT-LOSS PROGRAM STRESSING CALORIE RESTRICTION VERSUS CALORIE PLUS FAT RESTRICTION IN OBESE INDIVIDUALS WITH NIDDM OR A FAMILY HISTORY OF DIABETES, Diabetes care, 18(9), 1995, pp. 1241-1248
Citations number
36
Categorie Soggetti
Endocrynology & Metabolism","Medicine, General & Internal
Journal title
ISSN journal
01495992
Volume
18
Issue
9
Year of publication
1995
Pages
1241 - 1248
Database
ISI
SICI code
0149-5992(1995)18:9<1241:EOABWP>2.0.ZU;2-E
Abstract
OBJECTIVE - The aim of this randomized trial was to compare the effect s of a behavioral intervention focusing on either calorie restriction alone or calorie plus fat restriction on weight loss and changes in li pids and glycemic control in individuals with non-insulin-dependent di abetes mellitus (NIDDM) or a family history of diabetes. RESEARCH DESI GN AND METHODS - We recruited 44 obese women with NIDDM and 46 obese w omen with a family history of NIDDM and randomly assigned these subjec ts to calorie restriction (GAL) or to calorie plus fat restriction (CA L+FAT). All subjects participated in a 16-week behavioral weight loss program, with training in diet, exercise, and behavior modification. S ubjects assigned to the CAL condition were given a 1,000-1,500 kcal/da y goal and self-monitored calories consumed. Subjects assigned to the CAL+FAT condition had the same calorie goal, but were also given a fat goal (grams of fat/day), to produce a diet with <20% of calories from fat; this group monitored both calories and fat grams. RESULTS - Amon g NIDDM subjects, weight loss of the subjects in the CAL+FAT condition was significantly greater than subjects in the CAL condition (7.7 vs. 4.6 kg) and the CAL+FAT condition group also maintained their weight loss better at the 1-year fellow-up (5.2 vs. 1.0 kg). Significant decr eases in glucose, high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol, and tota l cholesterol were seen after 16 weeks of treatment among NIDDM subjec ts; these changes were similar in CAL and CAL+FAT groups, but a greate r proportion of subjects in CAL condition required oral hypoglycemic m edication. At the 1-year follow-up, all parameters had returned to bas eline in NIDDM subjects, except HDL cholesterol, which continued to be significantly below baseline. No significant differences in weight lo ss or physiological changes were seen between CAL and CAL+FAT conditio ns in subjects with a family history of diabetes. CONCLUSIONS - These results suggest that using the combination of calorie and fat restrict ion may help promote weight loss in obese NIDDM patients. No other lon g-term benefits of this regimen were observed.