EFFECTS OF A BEHAVIORAL WEIGHT-LOSS PROGRAM STRESSING CALORIE RESTRICTION VERSUS CALORIE PLUS FAT RESTRICTION IN OBESE INDIVIDUALS WITH NIDDM OR A FAMILY HISTORY OF DIABETES
Rw. Pascale et al., EFFECTS OF A BEHAVIORAL WEIGHT-LOSS PROGRAM STRESSING CALORIE RESTRICTION VERSUS CALORIE PLUS FAT RESTRICTION IN OBESE INDIVIDUALS WITH NIDDM OR A FAMILY HISTORY OF DIABETES, Diabetes care, 18(9), 1995, pp. 1241-1248
Citations number
36
Categorie Soggetti
Endocrynology & Metabolism","Medicine, General & Internal
OBJECTIVE - The aim of this randomized trial was to compare the effect
s of a behavioral intervention focusing on either calorie restriction
alone or calorie plus fat restriction on weight loss and changes in li
pids and glycemic control in individuals with non-insulin-dependent di
abetes mellitus (NIDDM) or a family history of diabetes. RESEARCH DESI
GN AND METHODS - We recruited 44 obese women with NIDDM and 46 obese w
omen with a family history of NIDDM and randomly assigned these subjec
ts to calorie restriction (GAL) or to calorie plus fat restriction (CA
L+FAT). All subjects participated in a 16-week behavioral weight loss
program, with training in diet, exercise, and behavior modification. S
ubjects assigned to the CAL condition were given a 1,000-1,500 kcal/da
y goal and self-monitored calories consumed. Subjects assigned to the
CAL+FAT condition had the same calorie goal, but were also given a fat
goal (grams of fat/day), to produce a diet with <20% of calories from
fat; this group monitored both calories and fat grams. RESULTS - Amon
g NIDDM subjects, weight loss of the subjects in the CAL+FAT condition
was significantly greater than subjects in the CAL condition (7.7 vs.
4.6 kg) and the CAL+FAT condition group also maintained their weight
loss better at the 1-year fellow-up (5.2 vs. 1.0 kg). Significant decr
eases in glucose, high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol, and tota
l cholesterol were seen after 16 weeks of treatment among NIDDM subjec
ts; these changes were similar in CAL and CAL+FAT groups, but a greate
r proportion of subjects in CAL condition required oral hypoglycemic m
edication. At the 1-year follow-up, all parameters had returned to bas
eline in NIDDM subjects, except HDL cholesterol, which continued to be
significantly below baseline. No significant differences in weight lo
ss or physiological changes were seen between CAL and CAL+FAT conditio
ns in subjects with a family history of diabetes. CONCLUSIONS - These
results suggest that using the combination of calorie and fat restrict
ion may help promote weight loss in obese NIDDM patients. No other lon
g-term benefits of this regimen were observed.