Rl. Fulton et al., CONFUSION SURROUNDING THE TREATMENT OF TRAUMATIC CARDIAC-ARREST, Journal of the American College of Surgeons, 181(3), 1995, pp. 209-214
BACKGROUND: To delineate the most reasonable approach to patients with
traumatic cardiac arrest we studied the experience at our level 1 tra
uma center. STUDY DESIGN: Patients with life-threatening trauma admitt
ed during a 41-month period were screened to identify 245 patients who
suffered cardiac arrest. Mechanisms of injury, location of arrest, le
ngth of arrest, transport methods, treatment rendered, neurologic stat
e, outcomes, and cost of treatment were determined. RESULTS: Six (2.4
percent) patients survived. Mechanism of injury, location of arrest, a
nd age did not correlate with survival. Arrest time longer than ten mi
nutes and loss of neurologic function were associated with mortality.
Cost of care was not excessive. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with traumatic c
ardiac arrest with intact neurologic function should receive treatment
. Resuscitation should not be attempted in patients who also have seve
re brain injury or prolonged time of cardiac arrest.