J. Dale et al., PATIENTS TELEPHONING A-AND-E FOR ADVICE - A COMPARISON OF EXPECTATIONS AND OUTCOMES, Journal of accident & emergency medicine, 14(1), 1997, pp. 21-23
Objective-To investigate the expectations of patients when they phone
the accident and emergency (A&E) department, how this relates to the a
dvice they receive, the action they subsequently take, and their satis
faction with the service. Setting-The study was undertaken at an inner
city hospital in south east London. Methods-597 calls to the departme
nt were documented during the study period, and callers for whom a pho
ne number had been recorded were followed up by structured interviews
carried out by a trained interviewer within 72 h of the call. Up to th
ree attempts were made to contact each patient. The interviews were co
nducted at various times of the day to avoid excluding people with dif
ferent work or social patterns. Results-The interviewer was able to co
ntact 203 patients within 72 h of their call to the A&E department. Of
these 197 (97%) agreed to participate. Almost two thirds stated that
when they phoned A&E they anticipated receiving self care advice; 11%
expected to be advised to see or contact their general practitioner. O
nly a quarter of callers stated that they had expected to be told to a
ttend A&E. There was disagreement between the advice that nurses docum
ented as having been given, the advice the caller recalled receiving,
and the action the patient subsequently took. Even so, 107 (55%) calle
rs were very satisfied and 62 (32%) were satisfied, while 11 (6%) were
dissatisfied with the telephone consultation; 15 (8%) were unsure. In
all, 170 (87%) thought the advice they received was helpful. Conclusi
ons-Understanding the reasons why patients phone A&E departments and t
heir expectations should contribute to developing more responsive and
effective services.