CLINICAL-EVALUATION OF MEROPENEM VERSUS CEFTAZIDIME FOR THE TREATMENTOF PSEUDOMONAS SPP INFECTIONS IN CYSTIC-FIBROSIS PATIENTS

Citation
S. Byrne et al., CLINICAL-EVALUATION OF MEROPENEM VERSUS CEFTAZIDIME FOR THE TREATMENTOF PSEUDOMONAS SPP INFECTIONS IN CYSTIC-FIBROSIS PATIENTS, Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy, 36, 1995, pp. 135-143
Citations number
21
Categorie Soggetti
Microbiology,"Pharmacology & Pharmacy
ISSN journal
03057453
Volume
36
Year of publication
1995
Supplement
A
Pages
135 - 143
Database
ISI
SICI code
0305-7453(1995)36:<135:COMVCF>2.0.ZU;2-L
Abstract
Cystic fibrosis patients (children and young adults) with Pseudomonas spp. chest infections were treated with meropenem or ceftazidime. This study was the first to investigate the use of meropenem in cystic fib rosis. Meropenem was well tolerated with only transient elevations of serum transaminases. No patient experienced nausea and vomiting, even when meropenem was administered as a bolus injection. This allowed hom e therapy to be used. Meropenem appeared to be at least as active as c eftazidime even at the low doses used. Patients showed a greater impro vement in respiratory function on meropenem than ceftazidime. Only one patient (out of 60 courses) failed to respond to meropenem (98% succe ss rate) compared with two failures out of 21 episodes with ceftazidim e (90% success rate). There was little emergence of resistance to mero penem even though some patients were treated up to eight times over a 2 year period.