Detection of auditory signals under frequency uncertainty can be impro
ved by presenting: cues to the listeners. Since various cues have been
found to differ in effectiveness, three conceivable mechanisms were c
onsidered which might account for these differences. Cuing might reduc
e the number and/or width of the employed auditory filters or listenin
g bands. Also, cues could modulate the precision of frequency tuning o
f the filters. Psychometric functions were collected in a detection ex
periment with frequency uncertainty employing three kinds of cues: pur
e tones whose frequency was identical to that of the signal (iconic cu
es), complex tones with a missing fundamental equal to the signal (com
plex cues), and pure tones with a certain frequency relation to the si
gnal (relative cues). Compared with a no-cue condition, all cue types
improved detection performance. Fitting models to the data suggests th
at in the no-cue condition as well as the complex-cue condition, multi
ple bands were utilized, and that the iconic and relative cues induced
single-band listening. There is no indication that accuracy of freque
ncy tuning was responsible for cue-efficiency differences.