M. Rehner et al., COMPARISON OF PANTOPRAZOLE VERSUS OMEPRAZOLE IN THE TREATMENT OF ACUTE DUODENAL ULCERATION - A MULTICENTER STUDY, Alimentary pharmacology & therapeutics, 9(4), 1995, pp. 411-416
Methods: In this randomized, double-blind, multicentre study, the prot
on pump inhibitors pantoprazole and omeprazole were compared in patien
ts with active duodenal ulcers. Two hundred and seventy-six protocol-c
orrect patients received either pantoprazole 40 mg (n = 185) or omepra
zole 20 mg (n = 91), once daily for 2 or 4 weeks, depending on the pro
gress of ulcer healing. Results: Rates of complete ulcer healing after
2 weeks were 71% in patients given pantoprazole and 74% in patients g
iven omeprazole, After 4 weeks the figures were 96% and 91%, respectiv
ely, These differences were not significant. There was no significant
difference in ulcer pain prior to treatment, and 85% of the pantoprazo
le group and 86% on omeprazole were pain-free after 2 weeks (not signi
ficant). The time until complete pain relief with pantoprazole or omep
razole, based on data from diary cards, was not significantly differen
t (P > 0.05, Uleman's U-test). Both treatments were equally well toler
ated. Changes in routine laboratory parameters were minimal in both gr
oups, Conclusion: Pantoprazole was shown to be a highly-effective and
well-tolerated treatment for acute duodenal ulcer, Pantoprazole 40 mg
and omeprazole 20 mg were equally effective with respect to ulcer heal
ing and pain relief, and have similar adverse event profiles.