AORTIC-VALVE REPLACEMENT WITH CRYOPRESERVED PULMONARY ALLOGRAFTS - 5 YEARS FOLLOW-UP

Citation
R. Mair et al., AORTIC-VALVE REPLACEMENT WITH CRYOPRESERVED PULMONARY ALLOGRAFTS - 5 YEARS FOLLOW-UP, The Annals of thoracic surgery, 60(2), 1995, pp. 185-188
Citations number
16
Categorie Soggetti
Surgery
ISSN journal
00034975
Volume
60
Issue
2
Year of publication
1995
Supplement
S
Pages
185 - 188
Database
ISI
SICI code
0003-4975(1995)60:2<185:ARWCPA>2.0.ZU;2-Q
Abstract
Excellent clinical results with pulmonary autografts and experimental evidence that pulmonary valves can withstand the higher stress in the systemic circulation led us to use the cryopreserved pulmonary allogra ft for aortic valve replacement. From September 1988 until March 1993, 126 consecutive patients (61 +/- 10 years; 74 men and 52 women) under went aortic valve replacement with a cryopreserved pulmonary allograft . All allografts were inserted freehand in the subcoronary position. T here were four in-hospital deaths (3.2%), and 1 patient had severe val vular incompetence immediately postoperatively, requiring reoperation after 4 weeks. One hundred twenty-one patients were followed up in 3- to 6-month intervals for 25.3 +/- 16.3 months (range, 6 to 66 months), and valve performance was assessed routinely by means of color-flow D oppler echocardiography. Nine patients (7.1%) died during follow-up. T wo patients died of multiple septic emboli during bacterial endocardit is, and 1 patient died of a massive stroke. The other 6 patients died of myocardial infarction (4), respiratory insufficiency due to chronic obstructive lung disease (1), and carcinoma (1). Ninety-four patients (78%) had absent or trivial aortic valve regurgitation. Valvular inco mpetence class II was present in 3 patients (2.5%), whereas 5 others ( 4%) demonstrated class II to III. Severe aortic regurgitation (class I II or IV) could be detected in 10 patients (8.3%). All underwent reope ration and replacement of the valve with a prosthetic device. Bacteria l endocarditis caused graft incompetence in 3 patients, valve degenera tion was detected in another 3, and technical mistakes at valve implan tation caused valve failure in the other 4. We assume that a mismatch in size between the allograft and the aortic annulus could have led to dilation of the allograft valve ring and consequently to central valv ular incompetence in the patients without cusp degeneration. Cryoprese rved pulmonary allografts achieve acceptable intermediate-term results , which can be improved if initial technical problems can be avoided. Disturbingly, the incidence of endocarditis in our series was higher t han expected.