From 1983 to 1992, 366 patients received 407 Mitroflow pericardial val
ves. Mean age was 62 +/- 14 years. Average follow-up was 72 +/- 28 mon
ths. Total follow-up was 1,791 patient-years. Overall survival in all.
patients was 77.2% +/- 2.2% at 5 years and 56.2% +/- 6.4% at 10 years
. Freedom from structural valve deterioration was 95% +/- 1.2% and 36.
7% +/- 8.1% at 5 and 10 years for all valves, 96.9% +/- 1.3% and 39.2%
+/- 9.8% for aortic valve replacement, and 91.7% +/- 3.2% and 36.4% /- 10% for mitral valve replatement (p = not significant). The freedom
from structural valve deterioration in patients older than 70 years o
f age was 100% and 93.9% +/- 5.8% at 5 and 10 years, respectively. At
10 years, linearized rate of thromboembolism was 0.73% +/- 0.2% per pa
tient-year and freedom from valve-related mortality for all valves was
88.8% +/- 2.8%. The best indication for the implantation of a Mitrofl
ow valve is mitral or aortic disease in patients more than 70 years of
age.