G. Berci et al., INDIVIDUAL ASSESSMENT OF VISUAL-PERCEPTION BY SURGEONS OBSERVING THE SAME LAPAROSCOPIC ORGANS WITH VARIOUS IMAGING-SYSTEMS, Surgical endoscopy, 9(9), 1995, pp. 967-973
Laparoscopic surgery necessitates that operations be performed via a t
elevision screen; therefore, image quality is crucial in determining t
he final outcome. Electronic imaging systems are constantly undergoing
revisions and incorporating new ideas. Recently, we have been confron
ted with a variety of systems, and we, as operators, have no idea what
the differences are between the old and the newer systems. As clinici
ans, we have no electronic yardstick available to compare the options
presented or to check the specifications. This study examines critical
aspects of image perception. General surgeons, gynecologists, operati
ng room nurses, as well as allied health personnel all experienced in
laparoscopic surgery participated as test subjects. A blinded study wa
s performed in which various camera systems (single chip, three-chip,
digitized and nondigitized) were displayed in random fashion. Porcine
abdominal areas were displayed using the various imaging units. Partic
ipants graded image perception based on the following characteristics:
sharpness, color, contrast, and depth of field. The audience were bli
nded to the types, brand, and number of cameras utilized. A significan
t preference was shown for digitized systems (P < 0.0001). Also, digit
ized single-chip cameras scored higher than three-chip cameras (P < 0.
05). We propose thorough testing by surgeons and nursing personnel bef
ore deciding what type of equipment to purchase.