Monitoring risk-adjusted outcomes is the centerpiece of efforts to ens
ure health care quality, Because data collection is expensive, questio
ns arise concerning what information is essential to adjust for risk.
This investigation used retrospective analysis of existing, computeriz
ed clinical databases containing laboratory test results, information
on chronic coexisting conditions, and nursing evaluations of functiona
l status to predict in-hospital mortality. We studied persons admitted
to one tertiary teaching hospital between 1987 and 1992 for cerebrova
scular disease or pneumonia. Predictive models for each of the conditi
ons were developed using logistic regression; the results were validat
ed with split samples. We compared the predictive value of the nursing
functional status assessments and the clinical laboratory data. For e
ach study condition, the functional status data had as much prognostic
information as the laboratory data. Specifically, a nurse's report th
at a patient required total assistance for bathing was the best single
predictor of in-hospital mortality in the models for patients with ei
ther cerebrovascular disease or pneumonia. If hospitals admit patients
with different levels of functional impairment, it is important to ac
count for these differences before comparing outcomes across facilitie
s. Assessments of functional status are a simple, inexpensive measure
that may have considerable value.