Jjy. Sung et al., TRIPLE THERAPY WITH SUCRALFATE, TETRACYCLINE, AND METRONIDAZOLE FOR HELICOBACTER-PYLORI-ASSOCIATED DUODENAL-ULCERS, The American journal of gastroenterology, 90(9), 1995, pp. 1424-1427
Triple therapy with bismuth, metronidazole, and tetracycline or amoxic
illin is effective for the treatment of Helicobacter pylori, but side
effects are common. Sucralfate inhibits H. pylori hemagglutinin, prote
ase, and lipase and thus might affect colonization of the bacterium in
the stomach. Objective: We compared the efficacy and side effects of
triple therapy with sucralfate versus triple therapy with bismuth plus
omeprazole in the treatment of H. pylori-associated duodenal ulcer (D
U). Methods: One hundred and fifty DU patients were recruited in this
study; 71 cases were randomized to receive bismuth 120 mg q.i.d., metr
onidazole 400 mg q.i.d, and tetracycline 500 mg q.i.d. (BMT) for 1 wk,
and 79 cases were randomized to receive sucralfate 1 g q.i.d., metron
idazole 400 mg q.i.d., and tetracycline 500 mg q.i.d. (SMT) for 1 wk.
For the ulcer treatment, BMT patients were also given omeprazole 20 mg
daily for 4 wk, and SMT patients received sucralfate for 4 wk from da
y of randomization. Results: Fifty-three patients in the BMT group and
60 in the SMT group finished the treatment and follow-up at 8 wk. H.
pylori was eradicated in 49 out of 53 (92%) patients in the BMT group
and in 45 out of 60 (75%) patients in the SMT group (p = 0.0057). Fort
y-nine (92%) patients who received omeprazole and BMT and 53 (88%) pat
ients who received SMT had healed DU at 8 wk (p = 0.34). Side effects
related to medication were reported in 38 (71.7%) patients in the BMT
group and in 42 (70%) patients in the SMT group. On an intention-to-tr
eat basis, there was no difference in ulcer healing between the BMT gr
oup (93.1%) and the SMT group (89.7%). H. pylori eradication was achie
ved in 84.4 and 66.2% in the BMT and SMT groups, respectively (p = 0.0
18). Conclusion: Therapy of sucralfate, tetracycline, and metronidazol
e for 1 wk has a satisfactory but lower success rate in eradication of
H. pylori when compared with the conventional triple therapy plus ome
prazole. Side effects of this therapy are no fewer than the convention
al triple therapy.