TRIPLE THERAPY WITH SUCRALFATE, TETRACYCLINE, AND METRONIDAZOLE FOR HELICOBACTER-PYLORI-ASSOCIATED DUODENAL-ULCERS

Citation
Jjy. Sung et al., TRIPLE THERAPY WITH SUCRALFATE, TETRACYCLINE, AND METRONIDAZOLE FOR HELICOBACTER-PYLORI-ASSOCIATED DUODENAL-ULCERS, The American journal of gastroenterology, 90(9), 1995, pp. 1424-1427
Citations number
10
Categorie Soggetti
Gastroenterology & Hepatology
ISSN journal
00029270
Volume
90
Issue
9
Year of publication
1995
Pages
1424 - 1427
Database
ISI
SICI code
0002-9270(1995)90:9<1424:TTWSTA>2.0.ZU;2-L
Abstract
Triple therapy with bismuth, metronidazole, and tetracycline or amoxic illin is effective for the treatment of Helicobacter pylori, but side effects are common. Sucralfate inhibits H. pylori hemagglutinin, prote ase, and lipase and thus might affect colonization of the bacterium in the stomach. Objective: We compared the efficacy and side effects of triple therapy with sucralfate versus triple therapy with bismuth plus omeprazole in the treatment of H. pylori-associated duodenal ulcer (D U). Methods: One hundred and fifty DU patients were recruited in this study; 71 cases were randomized to receive bismuth 120 mg q.i.d., metr onidazole 400 mg q.i.d, and tetracycline 500 mg q.i.d. (BMT) for 1 wk, and 79 cases were randomized to receive sucralfate 1 g q.i.d., metron idazole 400 mg q.i.d., and tetracycline 500 mg q.i.d. (SMT) for 1 wk. For the ulcer treatment, BMT patients were also given omeprazole 20 mg daily for 4 wk, and SMT patients received sucralfate for 4 wk from da y of randomization. Results: Fifty-three patients in the BMT group and 60 in the SMT group finished the treatment and follow-up at 8 wk. H. pylori was eradicated in 49 out of 53 (92%) patients in the BMT group and in 45 out of 60 (75%) patients in the SMT group (p = 0.0057). Fort y-nine (92%) patients who received omeprazole and BMT and 53 (88%) pat ients who received SMT had healed DU at 8 wk (p = 0.34). Side effects related to medication were reported in 38 (71.7%) patients in the BMT group and in 42 (70%) patients in the SMT group. On an intention-to-tr eat basis, there was no difference in ulcer healing between the BMT gr oup (93.1%) and the SMT group (89.7%). H. pylori eradication was achie ved in 84.4 and 66.2% in the BMT and SMT groups, respectively (p = 0.0 18). Conclusion: Therapy of sucralfate, tetracycline, and metronidazol e for 1 wk has a satisfactory but lower success rate in eradication of H. pylori when compared with the conventional triple therapy plus ome prazole. Side effects of this therapy are no fewer than the convention al triple therapy.