This paper attempts to shed some light on the recent debate between th
ose who advocate a reformed medical geography and those who respond th
at reform is not necessary. We show that disease ecology and a reformi
st alternative display certain tendencies in the ways in which they ad
dress issues of health and disease. We use the example of geographic v
ariations in infant mortality rates to show how two non-positivist per
spectives from social theory, political economy and humanism, support
a reformist viewpoint, while also acknowledging the value of a complem
entary disease ecology approach. Two concepts, the social construction
of health and illness and social relevance, are used to portray the p
olitical economy approach; humanism is described in terms of the meani
ng of individual experience and the importance of place. The paper con
cludes with a discussion of the respective roles of disease ecology an
d a reformist approach in models of infant mortality and a summary of
the main differences between the two perspectives. Copyright (C) 1997
Elsevier Science Ltd