Km. Oreilly et Jc. Wingfield, SPRING AND AUTUMN MIGRATION IN ARCTIC SHOREBIRDS - SAME DISTANCE, DIFFERENT STRATEGIES, American zoologist, 35(3), 1995, pp. 222-233
The Arctic is an extremely inhospitable region for most of the year, b
ut during the summer months it bursts with life. A major proportion of
avian species nesting in the Arctic are shorebirds (order Charadriifo
rmes; suborder Charadrii). They migrate thousands of kilometers from t
heir wintering grounds to take advantage of abundant food resources ea
ch summer and display a variety of migratory strategies. In an attempt
to classify this variation, not only between spring and autumn migrat
ion, but within a migration, we present four categories. These relate
to the distance a species generally flies between stopovers: short dis
tance bout, intermediate distance bout, long distance bout, and combin
ations. We then explore further differences between spring and autumn
migration. Spring migrants experience poor weather and decreased food
availability as they fly north. Many cope with huge flocks, which serv
e as protection from predators, but may also reduce foraging efficienc
y and increase aggression. In contrast, autumn migrants generally enco
unter favorable weather and ample food. Flock sizes are usually smalle
r, thus foraging efficiency is higher and aggression lower than during
spring migration. Physiologically, spring migrants are preparing for
breeding and reproductive hormones are secreted. In the Western Sandpi
per (Calidris mauri), luteinizing hormone levels are higher for spring
than autumn migrants. Late spring migrants have higher testosterone l
evels than either early spring migrants or autumn migrants. Corticoste
rone levels are also higher in spring vs. autumn migrants. Although sp
ring and autumn migrants travel similar distances, their strategies di
ffer behaviorally and physiologically.