Pb. Pearman et al., TROPICAL AMPHIBIAN MONITORING - A COMPARISON OF METHODS FOR DETECTINGINTER-SITE VARIATION IN SPECIES COMPOSITION, Herpetologica, 51(3), 1995, pp. 325-337
Several methods have been proposed recently as standards for sampling
and monitoring amphibians. This study sought to (1) compare several sa
mpling methods during the establishment of a monitoring program and (2
) describe differences in species composition among the study sites. W
e investigated whether observed differences among sites depended on sa
mpling method. The study was performed at the Jatun Sacha Biological S
tation in the Upper Amazon Basin in Ecuador. We established seven site
s in primary forest and sampled amphibians four times over a 5-mo peri
od using transects searched during the day and night, artificial cover
stations, and artificial ponds. Significantly more species were found
during nocturnal searches of transects than with the other methods. I
n cluster analysis of species occurrences, both diurnal and nocturnal
transect searches identified one floodplain site as being distinct fro
m the rest. Sites appear most similar when artificial ponds were consi
dered and consistently less similar in data from nocturnally searched
transects. Data from both types of transect and from artificial cover
indicated that one site in the reserve's interior was particularly ric
h in species of Eleutherodactylus. Additionally, nocturnal transects d
etected increased species richness of hylid frogs at the two floodplai
n sites. This is consistent with the aquatic mode of reproduction of h
ylid frogs. Higher species richness of Eleutherodactylus is characteri
stic of drier terra firme forest with low disturbance. These trends ar
e most dear in data from nocturnally searched transects.