Dm. Jackson et al., WHY DOES CLOZAPINE STIMULATE THE MOTOR-ACTIVITY OF RESERPINE-PRETREATED RATS WHEN COMBINED WITH A DOPAMINE D-1 RECEPTOR AGONIST, European journal of pharmacology, 282(1-3), 1995, pp. 137-144
The aim of the present experiments was to investigate the locomotor st
imulant effects of the atypical antipsychotic agent, clozapine, in rat
s depleted of their dopamine by reserpine and cr-methyl-p-tyrosine pre
treatment. Clozapine itself induced a slight but never significant sti
mulation of locomotor activity which was enhanced by the addition of t
he selective dopamine D-1 receptor agonist, SKF38393 trahydro-7,8-dihy
droxy-1-phenyl-1H-3-benzazepine), but not by the selective dopamine D-
2 receptor agonist, quinpirole. The stimulation produced by clozapine
plus SKF38393 was blocked by the selective dopamine D-1 receptor antag
onist, SCH23390 (7-chloro-8-hydroxy-3-methyl-l-phenyl-2, hydrochloride
), while the selective dopamine D-2 receptor antagonist, haloperidol,
was ineffective. A combination of SCH23390 and haloperidol blocked the
clozapine plus SKF38393-induced locomotion. Unlike clozapine, neither
the selective 5-HT2 receptor antagonist, ritanserin, nor the dopamine
D-2 receptor antagonists, haloperidol and remoxipride, caused locomot
or activation when given alone or in combination with SKF38393. The in
directly acting sympathomimetic amine, d-amphetamine, was inactive in
the monoamine-depleted rats, indicating that no dopamine was available
for release by d-amphetamine. The muscarinic receptor antagonist, sco
polamine, alone did not alter locomotion, but produced marked stimulat
ion when combined with SKF38393 but not with quinpirole. This stimulat
ion was not affected by haloperidol. However, the scopolamine plus SKF
38393-induced stimulation was partially blocked by SCH23390 or by a co
mbination of haloperidol and SCH23390. The data indicate that clozapin
e, in rats depleted of their dopamine stores, exhibits properties cons
istent with those of a dopamine receptor agonist. The pharmacology of
this behavioural stimulation was similar but not identical to that see
n with the muscarinic receptor antagonist, scopolamine. The behavioura
l effects of clozapine reported here might be explained by a dual effe
ct: antagonism of muscarinic receptors and agonist-like activity at do
pamine receptors.