Ra. Baum et al., MULTICENTER TRIAL TO EVALUATE VASCULAR MAGNETIC-RESONANCE ANGIOGRAPHYOF THE LOWER-EXTREMITY, JAMA, the journal of the American Medical Association, 274(11), 1995, pp. 875-880
Objectives.-To assess the value of magnetic resonance angiography (MRA
) in presurgical evaluation of patients with severe lower limb atheros
clerotic occlusive disease and to assess the feasibility of rapidly co
nducting rigorous technology assessment. Design.-Blinded, prospective
study of consecutive patients with signs or symptoms of severe infrain
guinal peripheral vascular disease who were candidates for percutaneou
s or surgical intervention, Using both descriptive statistics and mult
ivariate logistic analyses, MRA was compared with contrast arteriograp
hy (CA) (the current technique) for imaging 15 arterial segments of th
e leg and foot. Intraoperative contrast angiography was the ''gold'' s
tandard. Also studied was the effect of adding MRA to the information
used in planning treatment.Setting.-Six US hospitals, one a community
hospital. Patients.-A total of 155; 84% with either rest pain or tissu
e loss. Results.-Sensitivity in distinguishing patent segments from co
mpletely occluded segments was 83% for CA and 85% for MRA; both had 81
% specificity, For distinguishing near-normal segments (suitable as by
pass graft termini), CA was less sensitive than MRA (77% vs 82%), but
more specific (92% vs 84%). After adjusting for same-reader effects, o
dds of correctly distinguishing patent segments were 1.6 times as grea
t for MRA as for CA (P<.01); for distinguishing near-normal segments,
the odds for CA were 1.5 times as great as for MRA (P<.05). The additi
on of MRA changed the treatment plan in 13% of patients; in 86% of the
se cases, the surgery actually performed indicated that the MRA-inclus
ive plan was superior. Conclusions.-Individually, MRA and CA are appro
ximately equivalent in diagnostic accuracy, The addition of MRA to tre
atment plans based only on CA and other diagnostic information clearly
improves the plans. Completed in 15 months (as planned), our study de
monstrates the feasibility of conducting rigorous technology assessmen
t rapidly enough to be timely even in fields in which diagnostic and t
reatment techniques are rapidly changing.