VARIATION IN CARBON-ISOTOPE DISCRIMINATION AND ITS RELATIONSHIP TO SPECIFIC LEAF-AREA AND RIBULOSE-1,5-BISPHOSPHATE CARBOXYLASE CONTENT IN GROUNDNUT GENOTYPES

Citation
Rcn. Rao et al., VARIATION IN CARBON-ISOTOPE DISCRIMINATION AND ITS RELATIONSHIP TO SPECIFIC LEAF-AREA AND RIBULOSE-1,5-BISPHOSPHATE CARBOXYLASE CONTENT IN GROUNDNUT GENOTYPES, Australian journal of plant physiology, 22(4), 1995, pp. 545-551
Citations number
36
Categorie Soggetti
Plant Sciences
ISSN journal
03107841
Volume
22
Issue
4
Year of publication
1995
Pages
545 - 551
Database
ISI
SICI code
0310-7841(1995)22:4<545:VICDAI>2.0.ZU;2-N
Abstract
Variation in carbon isotope discrimination (Delta) and ribulose-1,5-bi sphosphate carboxylase-oxygenase (Rubisco) content per unit leaf area was examined in leaves from upper and lower positions in the canopy of six groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.) genotypes, grown under irrigated and mild water-deficit conditions in the field. The leaf mass per unit leaf area (rho(L)) and soluble proteins in leaves were determined at 80, 96, 111 and 127 days after sowing (DAS), while Delta and Rubisco w ere determined at 80 DAS only. The mean Delta ranged from 18.2 to 20.2 parts per thousand among genotypes, representing a significant (P < 0 .01) variation. Rubisco content per unit leaf area also varied signifi cantly (P < 0.01) with genotype and leaf position. There was a trend t o an increase in Rubisco content under water deficit, but the effects were not significant. Leaves at the top of the canopy had a higher Rub isco content and lower Delta, than leaves at the bottom of the canopy. Genotype X leaf position interaction was significant for Delta and Ru bisco, indicating the importance of leaf position in selecting for wat er-use efficiency (W), using leaf traits in groundnut. Rubisco content and Delta were negatively related (r(2) = 0.65, P < 0.01). There was a significantly positive correlation between Rubisco content and rho(L ) in the upper leaves (r(2) = 0.60, P < 0.01), but not in the lower le aves in the canopy. However, the overall relationship between Rubisco and rho(L) (r(2) = 0.40) was not as strong as it was between Rubisco a nd Delta. The results suggest that, in groundnut, the basis of genotyp ic variation in Delta was mostly (> 60%) attributable to Rubisco conte nt per unit leaf area. In view of the leaf positional effects on Delta and Rubisco, the upper leaves in the canopy should be used for select ing genotypes for W based on leaf traits like rho(L) or Delta.