The Eurovision Song Contest is an international contest of artistic pr
owess. The organization of the voting process in the contest aims to c
reate a 'veil of ignorance' that promotes unbiased evaluations by prov
iding an equal opportunity for all contestants. This study scrutinizes
the departure of the Eurovision Song Contest's outcomes from its idea
l organizational conception and points to systematic preferences among
European blocs. By analyzing the patterns of relations between four e
mpirically derived European blocs, this study shows that hegemony resu
lts from the unique structural position that the Western bloc occupies
. This bloc enjoys a persistent position of a tertius gaudens that res
ults from the fact that (a) nations in this bloc favor each other and
export few points to other blocs; (b) the Northern and Mediterranean b
locs avoid each other, and therefore allocate their surplus votes to t
he Western bloc. The Western bloc longitudinally sustains its hegemoni
c position through the persistence of between- and within-bloc exchang
e relations. The assumed veil of ignorance legitimizes this structural
advantage. We propose that the fairness of the 'veil or ignorance' bo
th secures hegemony and - when analyzed appropriately - helps to uncov
er it. (C) Scandinavian Sociological Association 1996