The working behavior of ''proximity recording'' heads is described in
terms of physical changes which occur at the interface. The concept of
in-situ adjustment of fly height is described and verified with both
acoustic and component characterization techniques. We then contrast s
uccessfully versus unsuccessfully designed proximity interfaces, and i
llustrate two failure mechanisms associated with proximity recording.
An adequate understanding and control of these behaviors is shown to b
e critical for achieving a successful proximity design. We close with
comments regarding several generalized design constraints.