COMPARATIVE-STUDY OF DIFFERENT DIGESTION PROCEDURES USING SUPPLEMENTARY ANALYTICAL METHODS FOR MULTIELEMENT-SCREENING OF MORE THAN 50 ELEMENTS IN SEDIMENTS OF THE RIVER ELBE

Citation
P. Krause et al., COMPARATIVE-STUDY OF DIFFERENT DIGESTION PROCEDURES USING SUPPLEMENTARY ANALYTICAL METHODS FOR MULTIELEMENT-SCREENING OF MORE THAN 50 ELEMENTS IN SEDIMENTS OF THE RIVER ELBE, Fresenius' journal of analytical chemistry, 353(1), 1995, pp. 3-11
Citations number
15
Categorie Soggetti
Chemistry Analytical
ISSN journal
09370633
Volume
353
Issue
1
Year of publication
1995
Pages
3 - 11
Database
ISI
SICI code
0937-0633(1995)353:1<3:CODDPU>2.0.ZU;2-P
Abstract
The suitability of four different digestion procedures, i.e. i.) an aq ua regia digestion according to DIN 38 414-S7, ii.) a pressure digesti on using HNO3/HF in PTFE-vessels, iii.) a HNO3/HF + HCl-pressure diges tion in PTFE-vessels and iv.) a HNO3/HF + HCl-pressure digestion using microwave induction, has been evaluated with regard to the quantitati ve determination of about 50 elements in environmental samples. Three sediments of the river Elbe and two standard reference materials (MESS -1 and NIST 1645) have been employed. The analytical results from the dissolved samples, obtained using inductively coupled plasma mass- and optical emission spectrometry as well as total reflection X-ray fluor escence spectrometry, have been compared with those obtained by instru mental neutron activation analysis. Only digestion procedures using HN O3/HF with a subsequent evaporation to dryness and dissolution in HCl have led to appropriate results for a wide range of elements (more tha n 50 elements in total). Because of its low contamination risk and its time saving, the microwave digestion is preferred. For this digestion procedure the accordance among the different instrumental methods use d is high (better than 15% deviation) in general. A few elements (16) could be determined quantitatively only by a single method.