HIGH-INCIDENCE OF APPROPRIATE IMPLANTABLE CARDIOVERTER-DEFIBRILLATOR THERAPY IN PATIENTS WITH SYNCOPE OF UNKNOWN ETIOLOGY AND INDUCIBLE VENTRICULAR ARRHYTHMIAS
Ms. Link et al., HIGH-INCIDENCE OF APPROPRIATE IMPLANTABLE CARDIOVERTER-DEFIBRILLATOR THERAPY IN PATIENTS WITH SYNCOPE OF UNKNOWN ETIOLOGY AND INDUCIBLE VENTRICULAR ARRHYTHMIAS, Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 29(2), 1997, pp. 370-375
Objectives. This study evaluates the hypothesis that in patients with
syncope of unknown origin, inducible ventricular arrhythmias are speci
fic arrhythmias and therefore should be appropriately treated. Backgro
und. Although syncope is a common clinical entity, the evaluation and
treatment of patients with syncope without a clear etiology are not we
ll defined. Many patients with syncope of undetermined origin undergo
invasive electrophysiologic evaluation. Abnormalities of the sinus nod
e, prolongation of conduction times or inducible arrhythmias found at
these evaluations are usually assumed to be the cause of syncope and a
re therefore treated. However, whether tachyarrhythmias are truly the
cause of syncope, and whether treatment of these tachyarrhythmias can
prevent recurrent syncope and arrhythmic death, is unknown. Methods. T
his study included 50 consecutive patients with syncope of undetermine
d origin, ventricular tachyarrhythmias at electrophysiologic evaluatio
n and treatment with an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator. Result
s. Ventricular stimulation led to sustained monomorphic ventricular ta
chycardia in 36 patients, nonsustained ventricular tachycardia in 5 an
d ventricular fibrillation in 9. Over a 23 +/- 15 month (mean +/- SD)
follow-up period, 18 patients received appropriate implantable cardiov
erter-defibrillator shock. Actuarial probability of appropriate therap
y was 22% at 1 year and 50% at 3 years, Recurrent syncope was seen in
five patients, three of whom had appropriate defibrillator detections
at the time of syncope. Four patients died (sudden death in one, conge
stive heart failure in two). Conclusions. In patients with syncope of
undetermined origin and inducible ventricular tachyarrhythmias, approp
riate implantable cardioverter-defibrillator therapy is common at foll
ow-up. Sudden cardiac death is uncommon. This low incidence of sudden
cardiac death and high incidence of appropriate defibrillator therapy
support the current practice of using implantable cardioverter-defibri
llators in patients with syncope of unknown origin and inducible, vent
ricular arrhythmias. (C) 1997 by the American College of Cardiology.