Pj. Cozzi et al., PULMONARY-ARTERY DIASTOLIC-OCCLUSION PRESSURE-GRADIENT IS INCREASED IN ACUTE PULMONARY-EMBOLISM, Critical care medicine, 23(9), 1995, pp. 1481-1484
Objective: To assess the pulmonary artery (PA) diastolic-occlusion (we
dge) pressure gradient in patients with acute pulmonary embolism and t
o evaluate this variable's diagnostic utility. Design: Retrospective,
clinical review. Setting: Intensive care and cardiac catheterization u
nits of a university medical center. Interventions: None. Patients: A
series of 19 acute pulmonary embolism patients with concurrent right h
eart catheterization. Control groups consisted of 19 age-, sex-, and h
eart rate-matched critically ill controls who also underwent right hea
rt catheterization, eight patients suspected of having pulmonary embol
ism who had negative pulmonary angiography and concurrent right heart
catheterization, and 255 patients with a primary diagnosis of coronary
artery disease who underwent right heart catheterization at the time
of left heart catheterization. Measurements and Main Results: Initial
hemodynamics (systolic, diastolic, and mean systemic and pulmonary art
erial pressures, occlusion pressure, PA diastolic-occlusion pressure g
radient, cardiac output, systemic and pulmonary vascular resistances)
were compared between cohorts. Other than differences in the PA diasto
lic-occlusion pressure gradients, no significant differences were iden
tified between cohorts. Pulmonary embolism patients were found to have
increased PA diastolic-occlusion pressure gradients (10 +/- 5 vs. 3 /- 2 mm Hg for the critically ill controls [p < .0002], and 4 +/- 4 mm
Hg for the coronary artery disease cohort [p < .0005]). However, no s
ignificant difference in PA diastolic-occlusion pressure gradient valu
es was identified when patients with proven pulmonary embolism were co
mpared with patients in whom pulmonary embolism was clinically suspect
ed yet not confirmed by angiograms (10 +/- 9 mm Hg; NS). For three of
19 pulmonary embolism patients, no occlusion pressure could be obtaine
d due to an inability to wedge the balloon tip; 13 of 16 patients had
PA diastolic-occlusion pressure gradients of greater than or equal to
8 mm Hg. In the pulmonary embolism cohort, PA diastolic-occlusion pres
sure gradient correlated well with pulmonary vascular resistance (r(2)
= .50; p < .05), but not with cardiac output or heart rate. Conclusio
n: In the large number of patients with right heart catheters in whom
the question of pulmonary embolism is raised, an increased PA diastoli
c-occlusion pressure gradient (especially greater than or equal to 8 m
m Hg) may provide a clue to the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism, but i
s not specific for this diagnosis.