QUANTITATIVE, MORPHOLOGICAL, AND SOMATOTOPIC NUCLEAR-CHANGES AFTER FACIAL-NERVE REGENERATION IN ADULT-RATS - A POSSIBLE CHALLENGE TO THE NONEW NEURONS DOGMA
E. Fernandez et al., QUANTITATIVE, MORPHOLOGICAL, AND SOMATOTOPIC NUCLEAR-CHANGES AFTER FACIAL-NERVE REGENERATION IN ADULT-RATS - A POSSIBLE CHALLENGE TO THE NONEW NEURONS DOGMA, Neurosurgery, 37(3), 1995, pp. 456-462
THE ANATOMIC REORGANIZATION of the subnucleus that controls the styloh
yoid muscle (the stylohyoid subnucleus) within the brain stem facial n
ucleus was studied after regeneration of the facial nerve in adult rat
s. Horseradish peroxidase was injected into the right stylohyoid muscl
e 3 to 21 months after transection and repair of the right facial nerv
e at the level of the stylomastoid foramen. Position, number, and soma
diameter of retrogradely horseradish peroxidase-labeled motoneurons w
ere established, as well as the rostro-caudal extension of the stylohy
oid subnucleus. In experimental rats, the stylohyoid subnucleus showed
either an ipsilateral (50% of the rats) or a bilateral representation
. In all of the experimental rats, the motoneurons composing the stylo
hyoid subnucleus had a more dispersed horizontal distribution pattern
when compared with controls. More than 80% of the motoneurons were loc
ated outside the borders of the normal stylohyoid subnucleus, either v
entrally or, especially in the rostral sections, dorsally closer to th
e floor of the fourth ventricle. The mean rostro-caudal length of the
stylohyoid subnucleus was 2028.6 +/- 152.7 mu m. The mean motoneuron n
umber was 481.4 +/- 109.5 (2.20-fold greater than control values), and
the motoneuron diameter distribution ranged from 7 to 43 mu m. This s
tudy demonstrates that after regeneration of the facial nerve in adult
rats, major changes occur in both the location and number of motoneur
ons that make up the stylohyoid subnucleus. The increase in the number
of motoneurons, the location of the many cells in brain stem areas th
at normally do not contain motoneurons for facial muscles, and the app
earance of contralateral motoneurons are unexplained. One possible mec
hanism is new cell proliferation, migration, and differentiation in th
e central nervous system. This, rather than activation of adjacent ''d
ormant'' neurons, could explain both the significant increase in the n
umber of motoneurons in the stylohyoid subnucleus after facial nerve r
egeneration and the new somatotopic configuration of the subnucleus it
self.