Objective: To determine if the venous drainage of the spleen into the
portal circulation is essential for its ability to protect against enc
apsulated bacterial challenge. Design and Interventions: Three groups
of dogs were randomly assigned to undergo either sham laparotomy, sple
nectomy, or splenectomy with autotransplantation of the intact spleen
into the pelvis and formation of vascular anastomoses to the iliac ves
sels. Two weeks postoperatively, the dogs received a sublethal intrave
nous injection of Streptococcus pneumoniae type 25. Outcome Measures:
Bacterial clearances and inflammatory damage to the liver. Bacterial c
learance of the autotransplanted spleen should be no different from th
at of a sham-operation spleen and significantly different from that of
a splenectomized animal. In addition, immunologic function of the aut
otransplanted spleen should not differ from that of a sham-operation s
pleen in the degree of inflammatory damage to the liver. Results: No d
ifferences in bacterial clearance function were found between the anim
als that had undergone sham laparotomy or splenic autotransplantation.
However, bacterial clearance in the splenectomized animals was signif
icantly impaired. Histologic examination of the liver 2 weeks after th
e bacterial challenge revealed high-grade inflammatory damage to the l
ivers of splenectomized dogs, intermediate liver damage in dogs that u
nderwent autotransplantation, and essentially no damage in dogs that u
nderwent sham laparotomy. Autotransplanted spleens were essentially no
nreactive, lacking actively proliferating germinal centers, whereas sp
lenic tissue from sham-operation animals showed reactivity.Conclusion:
Although bacterial clearance function is unchanged in autotransplante
d spleens, this method still does not fully protect the liver from inf
lammatory damage.