RELATIONS BETWEEN COMPRESSIVE AXIAL FORCES IN AN INSTRUMENTED MASSIVEFEMORAL IMPLANT, GROUND REACTION FORCES, AND INTEGRATED ELECTROMYOGRAPHS FROM VASTUS LATERALIS DURING VARIOUS OSTEOGENIC EXERCISES
Ej. Bassey et al., RELATIONS BETWEEN COMPRESSIVE AXIAL FORCES IN AN INSTRUMENTED MASSIVEFEMORAL IMPLANT, GROUND REACTION FORCES, AND INTEGRATED ELECTROMYOGRAPHS FROM VASTUS LATERALIS DURING VARIOUS OSTEOGENIC EXERCISES, Journal of biomechanics, 30(3), 1997, pp. 213-223
A subject, who had undergone surgery to replace one hip joint and the
proximal half of the femur with an instrumented titanium implant, perf
ormed brief exercises whilst simultaneous measurements were made of co
mpressive axial force in the implant using short-range wireless teleme
try, ground reactions using a Kistler force plate, and electromyograph
ic activity of the vastus lateralis (VL) and erector spinae (ES) muscl
es using surface electrodes. Recordings were made barefoot and a earin
g 'trainers'. The exercises (slow jumping in counter movement style, f
ast continuous jumping, and jogging on the spot) have been found effec
tive in controlled interventions for increasing bone mineral density i
n women. The implant forces were 250-400% BW. The values were about tw
ice the magnitude of the ground reaction forces and significantly corr
elated with them for both peak force and its rate of rise but their re
altive magnitudes varied depending on mode of activity (jumping or jog
ging). Implant forces were significantly related to the muscle activit
y; in multiple regression analysis implant forces during take off from
slow jumps VL contributed significantly in addition to the ground rea
ction (98% total explained variance). There was more activity in VL du
ring jumping than jogging for the same implant force which may explain
why jumping appears to be more osteogenic than jogging for the femur.
For the same ground reaction, wearing trainers increased both the mag
nitude of the compressive loading of the femur and its rate of rise. (
C) 1997 Published by Elsevier Science Ltd.