We have reported that class I- [and lymphocyte function-associated ant
igen-1 (LFA-1-)] specific monoclonal antibodies (mAb) inhibit anti-CD3
-mediated activation of naive T cells. The present study investigated
the mechanism of this inhibition. CD28-specific mAb augmented stimulat
ion induced by soluble CD3 mAb, but this costimulation was also inhibi
ted by anti-class I or anti-LFA-1 mAb. However, stimulation of T cells
was not inhibited when activated B cells were present. Neither B7-1-
nor B7-2-specific blocking mAb or soluble CTLA-4, CD40 or gp39 restore
d the inhibition. Thus, other molecules expressed on activated B cells
are implicated for T-cell activation, which could compensate blockade
of class I or LFA-1 molecules. Inhibition induced by class I-specific
mAb could potentially be mediated through extracellular, transmembran
e or cytoplasmic domains of the target molecules. These possibilities
were evaluated by the use of mice transgenic for the Qa-2 molecule, se
lected for expression of Qa-2 at levels equivalent to classical class
I molecules. Qa-2 is inserted in the membrane through phosphatidylinos
itol linkages. Antibodies directed to Qa-2 inhibited CD3-induced stimu
lation, demonstrating that cytoplasmic and transmembrane protein seque
nces of class I molecules are not necessary for the inhibitory effect.
Inhibition thus presumably depends on extracellular domains. Finally,
T cells from beta 2-microglobulin knock-out mice responded to CD3-spe
cific mAb as well as their class I-positive littermates. Nevertheless,
stimulation of T cells from these mice with mitogenic anti-Thy-1 mAb
was markedly reduced. Signalling by Thy-1 and the CD3 complex may norm
ally occur through pathways in which class I molecules are implicated.