Rn. Edwards, ON THE RESOURCE EVALUATION OF MARINE GAS HYDRATE DEPOSITS USING SEA-FLOOR TRANSIENT ELECTRIC DIPOLE-DIPOLE METHODS, Geophysics, 62(1), 1997, pp. 63-74
Methane hydrates are solid, nonstoichiometric mixtures of water and th
e gas methane. They occur worldwide in sediment beneath the sea floor,
and estimates of the total mass available there exceed 10(16) Kg. Sin
ce each volume of hydrate can yield up to 164 volumes of gas, offshore
methane hydrate is recognized as a very important natural energy reso
urce. The depth extent and stability of the hydrate zone is governed b
y the phase diagram for mixtures of methane and hydrate and determined
by ambient pressures and temperatures. In sea depths greater than abo
ut 300 m, the pressure is high enough and the temperature low enough f
or hydrate to occur at the seafloor. The fraction of hydrate in the se
diment usually increases with increasing depth. The base of the hydrat
e zone is a phase boundary between solid hydrate and free gas and wate
r. Its depth is determined principally by the value of the qeothermal
gradient. It stands out on seismic sections as a bright reflection. Th
e diffuse upper boundary is not as well marked so that the total mass
of hydrate is not determined easily by seismic alone. The addition of
electrical data, collected with a seafloor transient electric dipole-d
ipole system, can aid in the evaluation of the resource. Methane hydra
te, like ice, is electrically insulating. Deposits of hydrate in porou
s sediment cause an increase in the formation resistivity. The data co
nsist of measurements of the time taken for an electrical disturbance
to diffuse from the transmitting dipole to the receiving dipole. The t
raveltime is related simply to the resistivity: the higher the resisti
vity, the shorter the traveltime. A sounding curve may be obtained by
measuring traveltimes as a function of the separation between the dipo
les and interpreted in terms of the variation of porosity with depth.
Two exploration scenarios are investigated through numerical modeling.
In the first, a very simple example illustrating some of the fundamen
tal characteristics of the electrical response, most of the properties
of the section including the probable, regional thickness of the hydr
ate zone (200 m) are assumed known from seismic and spot drilling. The
amount of hydrate in the available pore space is the only free parame
ter. Hydrate content expressed as a percentage may be determined to ab
out +/-epsilon given a measurement of traveltime at just one separatio
n (800 m) to epsilon%. The rule holds over the complete range of antic
ipated hydrate content values. In the second example, less information
is assumed available a priori and the complementary electrical survey
is required to find both the thickness and the hydrate content in a h
ydrate zone about 200 m thick beneath the sea floor containing 20 and
40% hydrate in the available pore space, respectively. A linear eigenf
unction analysis reveals that for these two models, the total mass of
hydrate, the product of hydrate content and thickness, may be estimate
d to an accuracy of about 3 epsilon% given measurements of traveltime
to an accuracy of epsilon% over a range of separations from 100 to 130
0 m. The value of the electrical information depends directly on the a
ccuracy to which transient arrivals can be measured on the sea floor i
n water depths exceeding 300 m over a separation of the order of a kil
ometer, the error parameter epsilon. While results of appropriate surv
eys, or even noise measurements, have not been published in the open l
iterature, surveys on a smaller 100 m scale have been conducted by my
group. Based on these data, I suggest that the value of epsilon may be
of the order of 3%.