Le. Harpster et al., THE INCIDENCE AND MANAGEMENT OF RECTAL INJURY ASSOCIATED WITH RADICALPROSTATECTOMY IN A COMMUNITY-BASED UROLOGY PRACTICE, The Journal of urology, 154(4), 1995, pp. 1435-1438
Purpose: We assessed the use of combination bowel preparation before r
adical prostatectomy. Materials and Methods: We reviewed 533 radical p
rostatectomies performed from 1984 to 1994. All patients underwent pre
operative combination bowel preparation. The incidence, management and
sequelae of rectal injury were determined. The literature addressing
the management of rectal injuries was reviewed. Results: Rectal injury
occurred in 8 patients (1.5%). Injury was recognized intraoperatively
and repaired primarily in 6 cases, and repair included colostomy in 2
. Injury was recognized postoperatively as recto-urinary fistula in 2
cases and initial management was conservative. No fistula closed with
conservative management. There were no pelvic abscesses and no deaths.
Conclusions: Combination bowel preparation permits safe closure of re
ctal injury at radical prostatectomy without the necessity of routine
colostomy. In the event of recto-urinary fistula, conservative managem
ent is not warranted.