IS AN ANTICHOLINERGIC AGENT SUPERIOR TO A BETA(2)-AGONIST IN IMPROVING DYSPNEA AND EXERCISE LIMITATION IN COPD

Study objective: To evaluate the impact of a week-long course of inhal ed albuterol compared with ipratropium on expiratory peak flow, exerci se performance, and dyspnea in patients with stable COPD. Design and i nterventions: A double-blind, two-period, crossover evaluation, wherei n the subjects inhaled albuterol, two puffs four times a day (qid) for 7 days, or ipratropiurn, two puffs qid for 7 days, in random sequence . Setting: Outpatients of the Pennsylvania State University Hospital, Lebanon VA Medical Center, and local private office practices. Partici pants: A sample of 15 subjects with stable COPD with FEV(1) <55% predi cted. Measurements and results: Variables measured at baseline (no inh aled bronchodilator) and/or on day 7 of each arm included FEV(1) (lite rs), 12-min walk test distance (meters), ''rescue'' puffs of metaprote renol needed each week, and dyspnea scoring after walking, on the Borg Category Scale (0 to 10=maximal). There was no significant difference in distance walked in 12 min (mean of 751.0 +/- 55.5 [+/-SE]) vs 755. 7 +/- 61.3 m) or perceived dyspnea (mean 2.1 +/- 0.4 vs 3.3 +/- 0.4) d uring albuterol or ipratropium use, Seven patients preferred ipratropi um, seven preferred albuterol, and one had no preference. Conclusion: We conclude that the effects of 1 week of albuterol or ipratropium hav e similar effects on exercise performance and subjective dyspnea in pa tients with stable COPD.