To assess the risks and benefits of menopausal hormone replacement the
rapy, we followed a 23,246-member, population-based cohort of Swedish
women who were prescribed menopausal estrogens for an average of 8.6 y
ears for mortality. Compared with the general population, the standard
ized mortality ratio for all cause mortality in this cohort was 0.77 (
95% confidence limits = 0.73, 0.81). Deaths in each of the 12 major ca
tegories of causes of death except for injuries occurred 12% to 86% le
ss frequently than expected. We examined in detail four specific cause
s of death according to the type of hormone prescribed, namely weak es
trogens (primarily estriol), more potent estrogens (primarily estradio
l and conjugated estrogens) in combination with a progestin, and more
potent estrogens without a progestin. Mortality from endometrial cance
r was not related to the prescription of weak estrogens or an estrogen
progestin combination, but mortality was 40% higher in women prescrib
ed more potent estrogens without a progestin. Women prescribed weak es
trogens, more potent estrogens, and the combined estrogen-progestin re
gimen were at reduced risk of death from ischemic heart disease (stand
ardized mortality ratios of 0.7, 0.6, and 0.4, respectively). The more
potent estrogens and the estrogen-progestin combination were associat
ed with a marked reduction in risk of intracerebral hemorrhage (standa
rdized mortality ratios of 0.4 and 0.6, respectively) and ''other'' ce
rebrovascular disease, but not other types of stroke. The concern that
use of progestins would lead to psychic disorders related to suicide
received no support from our results. Breast cancer results are descri
bed elsewhere. These data provide little evidence of an adverse effect
of the combined estrogen-progestin regimen as compared with estrogens
alone on mortality. They do indicate, however, that both selection fa
ctors and biology may contribute to the almost across-the-board reduct
ion in mortality associated with hormone replacement therapy.