This study investigated which of four resistance strategies (direct re
fusal, alternative, excuse, and explanation), varied by presence or ab
sence of face support, were effective in achieving instrumental, relat
ional, and identity goals of the resister. Participants were 132 first
- and second-year college students. Trained confederates resisted part
icipants' persuasive attempts within a simulated small-party interacti
on. Postinteraction questionnaires measured attraction to the confeder
ate and relational satisfaction. Number of persuasive attempts during
the interaction defined the dependent variable for the instrumental go
al of resistance. Those persuaders who received resistance strategies
with face support were more attracted to their partners and more satis
fied with the relationship than were those who received resistance str
ategies with no face support. Female participants were more attracted
to their partners and more satisfied with the relationship than were m
ale participants. No refusal strategy resulted in significantly fewer
persuasive attempts. Implications and recommendations for future resea
rch are discussed.