MOTION perception mechanisms have recently been divided into three cat
egories(1). First-order mechanisms(2-4) primarily extract motion from
moving objects or features that differ from the background in luminanc
e. Second-order mechanism(5,6) extract motion from moving properties,
such as a moving area of flicker in which there is no difference in me
an luminance between target and background. These first- and second-or
der motion mechanisms are primarily monocular. The existence of purely
binocular, interocular and various other unusual kinds of apparent mo
tion(7-13) has promoted conjectures of a third-order mechanism(1,14,15
), but there has been no clear suggestion as to the actual computation
s that such a mechanism might perform. Here we demonstrate 'alternatin
g feature' stimuli that produce apparent motion only when the observer
selectively attends to one of the embedded features in the display. T
he latent motion in the alternating feature stimuli is invisible to fi
rst-or second-order motion mechanisms, and the direction of apparent m
otion depends on the particular feature attended. These findings sugge
st the mechanism of third-order motion: the locations of the most sign
ificant features are registered in a salience map, and motion is compu
ted directly from this map.