Concentration-increasing capital transfers and horizontal mergers are
studied in a repeated oligopoly. It is found that these transactions a
re more likely to reduce price than traditionally argued. Even horizon
tal mergers without synergies may reduce price. Furthermore, a suffici
ent condition is found for total welfare to increase. Although this co
ndition is difficult to interpret in terms of easy observables, it is
weaker, in a large set of circumstances, than traditionally argued. Th
ese findings follow from the recognition that-possibly inefficient-par
tially collusive arrangements exist before a corporate restructuring.
The analysis stresses the nonrobustness of the results in the model wi
thout collusion.