Vk. Khare et al., USE OF ALGORITHMIC PATHWAYS TO DEVELOP QUALITY, COST-EFFECTIVE CLINICAL CARE, The Journal of the American Association of Gynecologic Laparoscopists, 2(2), 1995, pp. 169-174
Study Objectives. To analyze the cost of diagnosis and treatment assoc
iated with hydrosalpinges and pelvic adhesions using algorithmic pathw
ays. Design. Analysis of six pathways: (1) Chlamydia Ige antibody tite
r -> hysterosalpingogram -> diagnostic laparoscopy -> in vitro fertili
zation (IVF); (2) Chlamydia Ige antibody titer -> diagnostic laparosco
py -> therapeutic laparoscopy -> IVF; (3) hysterosalpingogram -> diagn
ostic laparoscopy -> therapeutic laparoscopy -> IVF; (4) diagnostic la
paroscopy -> therapeutic laparoscopy -> IVF; (5) no treatment; and (6)
IVF only. Setting A tertiary care practice at a university-associated
hospital. Patients. Patients were retrospectively chosen on the basis
of availability of results of Chlamydia IgG titers, operative notes f
rom laparoscopy, and hysterosalpingograms (HSGs). All patients identif
ied with these three results available were included. Interventions. D
etermination of results of laparoscopic treatment, IVF, and no therapy
(observation only), based on the literature. Measurements and Main Re
sults. The theoretical cost to achieve pregnancy for each pathway was
calculated by mathematical modeling. The greatest number of pregnancie
s for the least cost ($18,883/pregnancy) was from the diagnosis and tr
eatment of adhesions at laparoscopy with no previous screening. The le
ast costly approach to pregnancy for blocked tubes ($26,614/pregnancy)
was to start with an HSG. All pathways for adhesions and any screenin
g pathway using HSG for hydrosalpinges were more cost effective than I
VF. Conclusions. These pathways are limited, as they require several a
ssumptions and are based on a tertiary care population. Although HSG a
nd laparoscopy appeared to be the most cost-effective approaches to pr
egnancy, a primary care group may have a more cost-effective response
to the use of Chlamydia trachomatis IgG antibody screening.