YIELDS OF ALFALFA VARIETIES SELECTED FOR APHANOMYCES RESISTANCE IN KENTUCKY

Citation
P. Vincelli et al., YIELDS OF ALFALFA VARIETIES SELECTED FOR APHANOMYCES RESISTANCE IN KENTUCKY, Agronomy journal, 87(4), 1995, pp. 748-752
Citations number
19
Categorie Soggetti
Agriculture
Journal title
ISSN journal
00021962
Volume
87
Issue
4
Year of publication
1995
Pages
748 - 752
Database
ISI
SICI code
0002-1962(1995)87:4<748:YOAVSF>2.0.ZU;2-1
Abstract
Field tests were conducted over 4 Sr to investigate whether alfalfa (M edicago sativa L.) varieties and experimental populations selected for resistance to aphanomyces root rot (caused by Aphanomyces euteiches D rechsler) (here termed aphanomyces-selected varieties) would collectiv ely outyield varieties not selected for resistance (unselected varieti es). All entries were resistant to phytophthora root rot (caused by Ph ytophthora medicaginis E.M. Hans & Maxwell). At the conclusion of the tests, the mean cumulative dry matter yield of aphanomyces-selected va rieties was higher (4.2% increase, P = 0.063) than that of unselected varieties in a site naturally infested with A. euteiches and P. medica ginis, However, total yields of certain unselected varieties equated o r even exceeded (P = 0.10) those of certain aphanomyces-selected varie ties, and there was no correlation among varieties between yield and p ercentage of Aphanomyces-resistant plants. No significant difference i n mean cumulative yield was observed between aphanomyces-selected and unselected varieties in two sites infested with A. euteiches alone nor in four sites not infested with either pathogen, Since outbreaks of s eedling diseases were minor in all tests, the yield effects observed m ay be due to differences in plant health manifested after stand establ ishment, Our data are consistent with the hypothesis that selection fo r Aphanomyces resistance contributes to an overall improvement of elit e alfalfa germplasm for cultivation in poorly drained soils infested w ith both A. euteiches and P. medicaginis. However, considered alone, s election for Aphanomyces resistance in individual varieties was not al ways predictive of high yield in Aphanomyces-infested sites. These tes ts do not rule out the possibility of a substantial yield benefit to A phanomyces resistance under conditions unusually conducive to seedling disease induced by A. euteiches.