Recruitment failure has been implicated in the decline of several abal
one fisheries. Traditionally, fisheries scientists invoke theoretical
stock-recruitment relationships to predict trends in abundance of an e
xploited stock under various harvest regimes. The empirical evidence i
n support of a positive relationship between spawning stock and recrui
ts is not strong. A further problem in interpretation of such relation
ships is that both 'stock' and 'recruitment' have various definitions
in fisheries and ecological literature. The definition of a stock for
abalone is not clear. As emphasized in this review, which considers ea
ch stage in the Life history of abalone, the abundance of spawners is
one of many sources of variation in recruitment. The evidence for inve
rtebrates, particularly those with high fecundity, is that recruitment
varies independently of the abundance of spawners. This is also the c
ase for abalone, where recruits have been measured as the density of i
mmediate post-settlement individuals, juveniles, or as adults entering
the exploitable stock. A problem with stock-recruitment hypotheses is
that they have intuitive appeal. It is considered 'dangerous' to mana
ge fisheries under the assumption that a reduction in the number of sp
awners by fishing will not affect recruitment. Such danger to abalone
stocks has been more recently assessed by egg-per-recruit analyses, wh
ereby various harvest strategies are examined relative to reference po
ints for egg production. These studies are reviewed and assessed relat
ive to the often conflicting aims of managers and scientists. This rev
iew of studies of recruitment variation in abalone emphasizes the need
for a more rigorous, autecological approach to stock assessment in wh
ich field experiments are conducted over realistic spatial and tempora
l scales, permitting robust testing of hypotheses.