USE OF DECISION-ANALYSIS TO EVALUATE PATIENTS CHOICES OF DIAGNOSTIC PRENATAL TEST

Citation
Ms. Verp et Ps. Heckerling, USE OF DECISION-ANALYSIS TO EVALUATE PATIENTS CHOICES OF DIAGNOSTIC PRENATAL TEST, American journal of medical genetics, 58(4), 1995, pp. 337-344
Citations number
65
Categorie Soggetti
Genetics & Heredity
ISSN journal
01487299
Volume
58
Issue
4
Year of publication
1995
Pages
337 - 344
Database
ISI
SICI code
0148-7299(1995)58:4<337:UODTEP>2.0.ZU;2-U
Abstract
Women with a family history of a chromosomal or genetic abnormality mu st weigh several factors in choosing between amniocentesis and chorion ic villus sampling, We compared the prenatal test choices of three suc h women with those of decision analytic models that incorporated their preferences, Patient preferences were assessed using visual linear ra ting scales, Threshold analysis was used to determine preference range s, and stochastic sensitivity analysis to provide confidence levels, f or each choice of test, The test choices of patients and decision anal ytic models agreed in one case, and disagreed in two cases, In one of the latter two cases, stochastic and threshold analyses showed the dis agreement to be slight; for small shifts in preference differences for first- vs, second-trimester diagnosis, or first- vs. second-trimester therapeutic abortion, patient and decision model would have agreed, I n the other, stochastic analysis showed their differences to be large; there were no thresholds for early diagnosis, or for early therapeuti c abortion, that would have led to agreement between patient and model , In the two cases in which patient and decision model agreed or sligh tly disagreed, the patients had made their own choice of prenatal test , In the case in which patient and decision model strongly disagreed, the patient's physician had shared in the choice of test, Decision ana lysis can be useful in analyzing prenatal test choices based on indivi dual preferences for pregnancy outcomes, When choices of patients and decision models do not agree, examination of the locus of decision mak ing (patient vs, physician) may help resolve apparent differences. (C) 1995 Wiley-Liss, Inc.