Ms. Verp et Ps. Heckerling, USE OF DECISION-ANALYSIS TO EVALUATE PATIENTS CHOICES OF DIAGNOSTIC PRENATAL TEST, American journal of medical genetics, 58(4), 1995, pp. 337-344
Women with a family history of a chromosomal or genetic abnormality mu
st weigh several factors in choosing between amniocentesis and chorion
ic villus sampling, We compared the prenatal test choices of three suc
h women with those of decision analytic models that incorporated their
preferences, Patient preferences were assessed using visual linear ra
ting scales, Threshold analysis was used to determine preference range
s, and stochastic sensitivity analysis to provide confidence levels, f
or each choice of test, The test choices of patients and decision anal
ytic models agreed in one case, and disagreed in two cases, In one of
the latter two cases, stochastic and threshold analyses showed the dis
agreement to be slight; for small shifts in preference differences for
first- vs, second-trimester diagnosis, or first- vs. second-trimester
therapeutic abortion, patient and decision model would have agreed, I
n the other, stochastic analysis showed their differences to be large;
there were no thresholds for early diagnosis, or for early therapeuti
c abortion, that would have led to agreement between patient and model
, In the two cases in which patient and decision model agreed or sligh
tly disagreed, the patients had made their own choice of prenatal test
, In the case in which patient and decision model strongly disagreed,
the patient's physician had shared in the choice of test, Decision ana
lysis can be useful in analyzing prenatal test choices based on indivi
dual preferences for pregnancy outcomes, When choices of patients and
decision models do not agree, examination of the locus of decision mak
ing (patient vs, physician) may help resolve apparent differences. (C)
1995 Wiley-Liss, Inc.