As. Yang et B. Honig, FREE-ENERGY DETERMINANTS OF SECONDARY STRUCTURE FORMATION .2. ANTIPARALLEL BETA-SHEETS, Journal of Molecular Biology, 252(3), 1995, pp. 366-376
The factors that determine the stability of antiparallel beta-she ets
are considered via a theoretical analysis of conformational free energ
ies. A series of idealized model polyalanine beta-sheets are built wit
h constraints such that the angular geometry of hydrogen bonding varie
s in the range observed in proteins while hydrogen bonding distance re
mains fixed. The conformations of the sheets generated in this way hav
e a broad distribution of twist angles ranging from highly twisted lef
t-handed to highly twisted right-handed orientations. The association
free energies of the sheets are calculated with a gas phase CHARMM pot
ential and EDPB/gamma solvation models. Left-handed structures are fou
nd to be less stable than right handed structures due to intrachain st
eric hindrance in isolated left-handed strands. This explains why anti
parallel beta-sheets in proteins are invariably twisted in the right-h
anded direction. The free energy surface for right-handed sheets shows
particular preference for conformations ranging from flat to those th
at exhibit a pronounced right-handed twist. This suggests that antipar
allel beta-sheets can adopt a variety of right-handed conformations, a
result that is consistent with observations on known proteins. In par
allel with our study of alpha-helices we find that van der Waals and h
ydrophobic interactions are the primary factor stabilizing polyalanine
beta-sheets, while electrostatic interactions including hydrogen bond
ing are found to be destabilizing. However, in contrast to helices, th
e net change in conformational free energy involving only backbone-bac
kbone interactions (including beta-carbons) is not sufficient to overc
ome the loss in configurational entropy that accompanies sheet formati
on. Rather we suggest that cross-strand non-polar side-chain-sidechain
interactions are essential for sheet formation, explaining why large
non-polar amino acids have the greatest sheet forming propensities. Th
us, sheet propensities involve pairwise interactions and are expected
to be context dependent, as has been observed in recent experiments. (
C) 1995 Academic Press Limited