MIXING ANALYSIS OF AXIALLY OPPOSED ROWS OF JETS INJECTED INTO CONFINED CROSS-FLOW

Citation
Db. Bain et al., MIXING ANALYSIS OF AXIALLY OPPOSED ROWS OF JETS INJECTED INTO CONFINED CROSS-FLOW, Journal of propulsion and power, 11(5), 1995, pp. 885-893
Citations number
27
Categorie Soggetti
Aerospace Engineering & Tecnology
ISSN journal
07484658
Volume
11
Issue
5
Year of publication
1995
Pages
885 - 893
Database
ISI
SICI code
0748-4658(1995)11:5<885:MAOAOR>2.0.ZU;2-#
Abstract
A CFD parametric study was performed to analyze axially opposed rows o f jets mixing with crossflow in a rectangular duct. Isothermal analysi s was conducted to determine the influence of lateral geometric arrang ement on mixing. Two lateral arrangements were analyzed: 1) inline (je ts' centerlines aligned with each other on top and bottom walls) and 2 ) staggered (jets' centerlines offset with each other on top and botto m walls). For a jet-to-mainstream mass-now ratio (MR) of 2.0, design p arameters were systematically varied for jet-to-mainstream momentum-nu x ratios J between 16-64, and orifice spacing-to-duct height ratios S/ H between 0.125-1.5. Comparisons were made between geometries optimize d for S/H at a specified J. Inline configurations had a unique spacing for best mixing at a specified J. In contrast, staggered configuratio ns had two ''good mixing'' spacings for each J, one corresponding to o ptimum inline spacing and the other corresponding to optimum wall-impi nging jet spacing. The inline configurations, due to their smaller ori fice size at optimum S/H, produced better initial mixing characteristi cs. At downstream locations (e.g., axial distance-to-duct height ratio of 1.5), the optimum staggered configuration produced better mixing t han the optimum inline configuration for J of 64; the opposite results were observed for J of 16. Increasing J resulted in better mixing cha racteristics if each configuration was optimized with respect to orifi ce spacing. For jet-to-mainstream MRs of 2.0, the optimum mixing equat ion [(S/H)root J = C] of Holdeman was substantiated, except the optimu m mixing constant C increased by a factor of 1.8 for two-sided inline configurations.