DOUBLE-BLIND COMPARISON OF THE EFFICACY AND TOLERABILITY OF SIMVASTATIN AND FLUVASTATIN IN PATIENTS WITH PRIMARY HYPERCHOLESTEROLEMIA

Citation
L. Ose et al., DOUBLE-BLIND COMPARISON OF THE EFFICACY AND TOLERABILITY OF SIMVASTATIN AND FLUVASTATIN IN PATIENTS WITH PRIMARY HYPERCHOLESTEROLEMIA, Clinical drug investigation, 10(3), 1995, pp. 127-138
Citations number
18
Categorie Soggetti
Pharmacology & Pharmacy
Journal title
ISSN journal
11732563
Volume
10
Issue
3
Year of publication
1995
Pages
127 - 138
Database
ISI
SICI code
1173-2563(1995)10:3<127:DCOTEA>2.0.ZU;2-X
Abstract
The clinical efficacy and tolerability of simvastatin and fluvastatin were compared in 432 patients with primary hypercholesterolaemia in a multinational, randomised, double-blind trial. Following at least 10 w eeks on a lipid-lowering diet, patients continuing to have a total cho lesterol level greater than or equal to 6.5 mmol/L and elevated low de nsity lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol levels received 6 weeks of once-da ily treatment with either simvastatin 5 mg (n = 109), simvastatin 10 m g (n = 110), fluvastatin 20 mg (n = 105), or fluvastatin 40 mg (n = 10 8). The relative potency rates of simvastatin to fluvastatin in reduci ng LDL and total cholesterol levels were estimated to be 7.60 and 7.65 , respectively. Significantly greater mean reductions in LDL cholester ol levels were found at week 6 with simvastatin 10 mg (30%) compared w ith either fluvastatin 20 mg (22%; p < 0.001) or fluvastatin 40 mg (26 %; p = 0.03). Similarly, LDL cholesterol was lowered more in the simva statin 5 mg group (26%) than in the fluvastatin 20 mg group (22%; p = 0.03). No significant difference was seen between simvastatin 5 mg and fluvastatin 40 mg. Plasma total cholesterol levels were also signific antly lower with simvastatin 10 mg compared with fluvastatin 20 mg (23 vs 16%; p < 0.001) and fluvastatin 40 mg (23 vs 19%; p = 0.02), and w ith simvastatin 5 mg compared with fluvastatin 20 mg (19 vs 16%; p = 0 .01). Simvastatin 5 mg and fluvastatin 40 mg both lowered total choles terol levels by 19%. The percentage of patients reaching National Chol esterol Education Program Adult Treatment Panel II (NCEP ATP II) targe t LDL cholesterol levels after 6 weeks' treatment with simvastatin 5 o r 10 mg/day or fluvastatin 20 or 40 mg/day was 24, 25, 12 and 21%, res pectively. Tolerability profiles were generally similar, although sign ificantly more gastrointestinal adverse events occurred in the fluvast atin-treated patients (23 vs 11%). In conclusion, simvastatin 10 mg/da y is more effective in lowering total and LDL cholesterol levels than the maximum recommended dose of fluvastatin (40 mg/day), whereas simva statin 5 mg/day and fluvastatin 40 mg/day showed similar efficacy.