J. Proulx et al., COPING STRATEGIES AS PREDICTORS OF DISTRESS IN SURVIVORS OF SINGLE AND MULTIPLE SEXUAL VICTIMIZATION AND NONVICTIMIZED CONTROLS, Journal of applied social psychology, 25(16), 1995, pp. 1464-1483
This study investigated the relationship between coping strategies and
distress symptomatology in survivors of sexual revictimization. Copin
g strategies were assessed with the revised Ways of Coping Scale (Aldw
in & Revenson, 1987). Distress symptoms included global distress, depr
ession, anxiety, and somatization. Subjects were 44 survivors of sexua
l victimization in both childhood and adulthood; 54 survivors of a sin
gle incident of sexual victimization in childhood; and 256 nonvictimiz
ed individuals. All were drawn from a subject pool of female undergrad
uate students. Multivariate analysis of variance revealed significant
differences between groups on reported symptomatology and coping strat
egies. Victimized groups reported more distress than did the nonvictim
ized group. The multiple victimization group indicated greater use of
coping strategies than did the nonvictimized group, and both victimize
d groups reported greater use of the escapism strategy than did the no
nvictimized group. Multiple backward regression analysis found that co
ping strategies were predictive of distress symptomatology in all thre
e groups, with escapism as the most potent predictor of distress for e
ach group. Coping strategies were the most powerful predictors of dist
ress in the multiply victimized group. The results of this study provi
de strong support for the importance of addressing coping strategies i
n clinical intervention of distress, particularly with survivors of mu
ltiple sexual victimization.