COMPETITION INHIBITION OF CYTOTOXIC T-LYMPHOCYTE (CTL) LYSIS, A MORE SENSITIVE METHOD TO IDENTIFY CANDIDATE CTL EPITOPES THAN INDUCTION OF ANTIBODY-DETECTED MHC CLASS-I STABILIZATION
Mcw. Feltkamp et al., COMPETITION INHIBITION OF CYTOTOXIC T-LYMPHOCYTE (CTL) LYSIS, A MORE SENSITIVE METHOD TO IDENTIFY CANDIDATE CTL EPITOPES THAN INDUCTION OF ANTIBODY-DETECTED MHC CLASS-I STABILIZATION, Immunology letters, 47(1-2), 1995, pp. 1-8
We compared the efficiency of two commonly used cellular major histoco
mpatibility complex (MHC) class I peptide-binding assays to identify a
cytotoxic T lymphocyte (CTL) epitope-containing peptide among length
variants derived from the human papilloma virus type 16 (HPV 16) oncop
rotein E7. Although both assays identified the same sequence (E7 49-57
) as the most efficient D-b-binding peptide, the efficiency by which t
hey did so differed markedly. In a peptide competition cytotoxicity (P
CC) assay, based on inhibition of CTL lysis by competition for binding
to MHC class-I molecules between a known CTL epitope-containing pepti
de and peptide of interest, E7 49-57 bound 45-fold more efficiently to
D-b than the second D-b-binding peptide in line. In the widely used R
MA-S MHC class I peptide-binding assay, based on peptide-induced stabi
lization of 'empty' MHC class-I molecules at the surface of antigen-pr
ocessing defective RMA-S cells, this difference was only 3 fold. Simil
ar differences were observed when other D-b-restricted CTL clones and
CTL epitope-containing peptides were used in the PCC assay. The same p
henomenon was observed when peptide binding affinities for H-2K(b) wer
e analyzed in both assays. We conclude that the PCC assay discriminate
s more efficiently between high- and low-affinity MHC class I binding
peptides than the RMA-S assay. This observation is ascribed to the fac
t that peptide-MHC class I dissociation is an important parameter in t
he PCC but not the RMA-S assay.